Judge whether two NAP variants are the same business
Judges: Two listing records (name, address, suite, phone) that code could not normalise to an exact match. Questions: choice:relation - same_entity_formatting_variant, same_entity_old_data, different_practitioner_same_address, different_business, cannot_tell. Action: Code merges
AA clean typed decision (yes/no, a pick from a list, or a level on a scale) that is concrete, repeats routinely, and has meaningful value.4.15
Key facts
- Vertical
- Cross-industry
- Function
- Local & reputation
- Status
- Idea
- Volume
- routine
- Value
- meaningful
- Risk
- moderate
- Evidence
- —
- Flags
- None
Build this with a classifier
Define a typed decision with a bounded answer, then evaluate it on examples.
{
"decision_type": "choice",
"question": "Does this input match the decision in “Judge whether two NAP variants are the same business”?",
"input": "<input to classify>",
"output": "one label from a fixed list"
}Related use cases
Cite this
Copy a link in your preferred format.