# Grant application eligibility screen: narrative fit

Judges: one project summary vs program purpose. Questions: noul:fits\_program\_purpose - ...; choice:funding\_category - supplied|none. Action: Obvious misfits get form decline reviewed by staff sampling.

Grade: A — A clean typed decision \(yes/no, a pick from a list, or a level on a scale\) that is concrete, repeats routinely, and has meaningful value.. Score: 3.72.

Vertical: Government & nonprofit.

Function: Research & education.

Status: Idea.

Volume: routine.

Value: meaningful.

Risk: moderate.

Evidence: null.

Flags: None.

- [Vertical](/verticals/government_nonprofit/)
- [Function](/functions/research_edu/)
- [Ballot measure explainer claim triage](/use-cases/ballot-measure-explainer-claim-triage/)
- [Cataloging subject heading proposer](/use-cases/cataloging-subject-heading-proposer/)
- [Candidate questionnaire answers consistency](/use-cases/candidate-questionnaire-answers-consistency/)
- [Impact outcome statement verification](/use-cases/impact-outcome-statement-verification/)
- [Grant report narrative consistency vs proposal](/use-cases/grant-report-narrative-consistency-vs-proposal/)
- [Finding-aid scope note checker](/use-cases/finding-aid-scope-note-checker/)