# Citation-claim support check at scale

Judges: one \(claim sentence, cited abstract\) pair. Questions: noul:supports - does the abstract support the claim as worded?; choice:relation - supports|contradicts|tangential|insufficient\_context. Action: Flag contradicts/tangential for author; auto-pass supports at high confide

Grade: A — A clean typed decision \(yes/no, a pick from a list, or a level on a scale\) that is concrete, repeats routinely, and has meaningful value.. Score: 5.14.

Vertical: Research & science.

Function: Research & education.

Status: Idea.

Volume: high.

Value: meaningful.

Risk: moderate.

Evidence: null.

Flags: None.

- [Vertical](/verticals/research_science/)
- [Function](/functions/research_edu/)
- [Research-data privacy gate](/use-cases/research-data-privacy-gate/)
- [Screening stage for systematic review](/use-cases/screening-stage-for-systematic-review/)
- [Lab notebook entry deviation detector](/use-cases/lab-notebook-entry-deviation-detector/)
- [Lab-meeting question triage](/use-cases/lab-meeting-question-triage/)
- [Reviewer-expertise matcher](/use-cases/reviewer-expertise-matcher/)
- [JEV-Paper-Radar](/use-cases/jev-paper-radar/)