# Candidate questionnaire answers consistency

Judges: two statements from same candidate. Questions: choice:relation - consistent/contradicts/unrelated. Action: Contradiction list for voter guide editors.

Grade: C — A clean typed decision with low volume or low value, or too vague to act on.. Score: 3.44.

Vertical: Government & nonprofit.

Function: Research & education.

Status: Idea.

Volume: occasional.

Value: meaningful.

Risk: moderate.

Evidence: null.

Flags: None.

- [Vertical](/verticals/government_nonprofit/)
- [Function](/functions/research_edu/)
- [Ballot measure explainer claim triage](/use-cases/ballot-measure-explainer-claim-triage/)
- [Grant application eligibility screen: narrative fit](/use-cases/grant-application-eligibility-screen-narrative-fit/)
- [Cataloging subject heading proposer](/use-cases/cataloging-subject-heading-proposer/)
- [Impact outcome statement verification](/use-cases/impact-outcome-statement-verification/)
- [Grant report narrative consistency vs proposal](/use-cases/grant-report-narrative-consistency-vs-proposal/)
- [Finding-aid scope note checker](/use-cases/finding-aid-scope-note-checker/)